吴杰

个人信息Personal Information

教授 博士生导师

招生学科专业:
力学 -- 【招收博士、硕士研究生】 -- 航空学院
航空宇航科学与技术 -- 【招收博士、硕士研究生】 -- 航空学院
机械 -- 【招收博士、硕士研究生】 -- 航空学院

性别:男

毕业院校:新加坡国立大学

学历:新加坡国立大学

学位:哲学博士学位

所在单位:航空学院

办公地点:流体楼C12-404

联系方式:wuj@nuaa.edu.cn

电子邮箱:

扫描关注

论文成果

当前位置: 中文主页 >> 科学研究 >> 论文成果

Comparative study of discrete velocity method and high-order lattice Boltzmann method for simulation of rarefied flows

点击次数:

所属单位:航空学院

发表刊物:COMPUTERS & FLUIDS

关键字:Rarefied flows Knudsen number Discrete velocity method High-order lattice Boltzmann method

摘要:A comparative study of discrete velocity method (DVM) and high-order lattice Boltzmann method (HLBM) is made in this work. The key difference between the DVM and HLBM lies in the use of equilibrium distribution function and discrete velocity. In the DVM, the complete Maxwellian distribution function or the Shakhov distribution function is used and the discrete velocity is to represent the continuous velocity domain in the particle velocity space. As a result, the integral forms for the moments of distribution function are approximated by numerical integration. In order to make the quadrature error to be small enough, a large number of discrete velocity points are required for the DVM in general case. In contrast, in the HLBM, the lattice Boltzmann model is utilized as the equilibrium distribution function and discrete velocity. The construction of lattice Boltzmann model is intended to seek a minimal set of velocities in the particle velocity space to represent the objective hydrodynamics. With lattice properties of the lattice Boltzmann model, the weighted sums of distribution functions at those velocity points can exactly satisfy the physical conservation laws. However, the choice of discrete velocity points may have considerable effect on the accuracy of HLBM for fluid flows with large Knudsen number as reported in literatures [26, 29-30, 34-36]. From this study, it was found that HLBM provides reasonable results for fluid flows at moderate Knudsen number and low temperature difference with less computational cost than that of DVM. For fluid flows with large Knudsen number and/or high temperature difference, the DVM is preferred although more computational cost is required. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

ISSN号:0045-7930

是否译文:

发表时间:2017-03-26

合写作者:Yang, L. M.,Shu, C.,Wang, Y.

通讯作者:Shu, C.,吴杰