点击次数：

所属单位：航空学院

发表刊物：Hangkong Dongli Xuebao

摘要：A research was made on two flutter boundary prediction methods: flutter margin method and auto-regressive and moving average model (ARMA) stability analysis method. The influence of parameter identification errors on the accuracy of boundary prediction was analyzed through numerical simulation case. And the prediction effectiveness of these two methods was analyzed by two wind tunnel flutter tests. The results showed that: (1) the identified damping error had less influence on the criterion of flutter margin method than the identified frequency error, and ARMA stability analysis method was more sensitive to the identified damping error than flutter margin method contrastively, thus the flutter margin method had better robustness than ARMA stability analysis method. (2) For wing bending-torsion coupling flutter, these two criterions had approximate variation curves, which differed in order of magnitude approximating to the biquadrate of the sampling frequency, and good decreasing trends helpful to predict flutter boundary in advance were presented. (3) For in-plane bending flutter, ARMA stability analysis method may have better applicability than flutter margin method. © 2018, Editorial Department of Journal of Aerospace Power. All right reserved.

ISSN号：1000-8055

是否译文：否

发表时间：2018-04-01

合写作者：周丽

通讯作者：陈黎阳